I thank my lucky stars that I live in one of the most celebrated and evocative neighborhoods in the world; who wouldn’t want the Vieux Carré to be safer for residents and visitors alike? I am also well aware of the risks I face living here: From my balcony, I can easily see the location where Wendy Byrne was murdered and it’s a rare day when I don’t pass by that spot during my meanderings.
As a resident of the French Quarter, I whole-heartedly support the creation of a French Quarter Security District — but not for self-serving purposes of the French Quarter elite and not without representation for the Average Joes and Janes that breathe what’s vibrant into my neighborhood on a day-to-day basis. There’s a class war being waged in the French Quarter right now, and it should not go unnoticed.
While the recent changes in the Administrative structure of New Orleans have been welcomed (Mitch Landrieu’s mayoral victory and the subsequent appointment of Chief Ronal Serpas as the Superintendent of the New Orleans Police Department), this changing of the guard has also given rise to an alarming bid for power in the city’s oldest neighborhood. The campaign for change is further aided by the election of Kristin Gisleson Palmer as the District C Councilperson; for the French Quarter, the degree of change has been particularly significant.
At the July 2010 NOPD 8th District New Orleans Neighborhood Police Anti-crime Council (NONPAC) meeting, a prominent officer on the Board of the Lower Quarter Crime Watch organization identified herself as being the complainant regarding the street musicians’ ordinance enforcement issue. Her reason for making the complaint was concern for her ability to consistently rent two properties located in the Marigny Triangle on Chartres Street (properties not located in the French Quarter).
For the benefit of this individual’s financial concerns, one of the most poignant aspects of what makes my neighborhood so very unique is being jeopardized in a most forceful and calculated manner. For more than two years’ time, this “issue” was never brought up at these meetings, nor has this individual attended NOPD 8th District NONPAC meetings with any notable frequency. Instead, enforcement of the noise ordinance regarding recorded music (not live performances) blaring from bars and clubs in the French Quarter nightly has been a recurring motif at these meetings, an issue that has yet to receive equal concern or effort with regard to its resolution.
The parcel fee/security district tax measure on the October 2nd ballot is equally disingenuous. If passed, a tax would be levied against property owners in the French Quarter to fund a security district to be administered by the French Quarter/Marigny Historic Area Management District (FQMHAMD). Although the FQMHAMD was created by an act of the Louisiana Legislature in 2007, it has struggled since that time to secure a consistent source of funding; what the Louisiana Legislature has failed to provide it is now seeking under the guise of managing a “security district.”
Here’s the thing: From the time of the FQMHAMD’s creation in 2007 through 2009, improving safety was only one item on a laundry list of priorities for this district, which are detailed as follows: “The statutory purpose of the District is to strengthen the area within its boundaries as a vital component of Louisiana’s tourism industry; aid in the preservation of the District’s architecture, quaint charm and tout ensemble; beautify its appearance; improve public safety, foster quality experiences and quality of life within its boundaries; and improve commercial and residential vitality. ” (Source: http://www.fqmhd.com/what-we-do.html)
“Improving public safety” did not become the FQMHAMD’s raison d’etre/rally cry to make a bid for funding until after Wendy Byrne’s murder on January 17, 2009. I wonder if any of the individuals serving on FQMHAMD’s 13-member Board of Commissioners actually knew Wendy; its members aren’t people I would expect to see at Aunt Tiki’s on Lower Decatur or to run into at Starlight by the Park on North Rampart Street. And yet, they’ve not hesitated to seize this opportunity to seek funding… Not for benefit of all who live or work in the Vieux Carré as an act of altruism, but as means of inspiring fear that “It could happen to you, too!” hand-wringing amongst the more affluent within this community.
While three members of the FQMHAMD Board of Commissioners are appointed from citizens’ groups [the Vieux Carré Property Owners, Residents, and Associates (VCPORA); French Quarter Citizens, Inc. (FQC); and the Faubourg Marigny Improvement Association (FMIA)], it is my understanding that all of these groups require an annual dues and are not, in general, representative of the taxing district’s population as a whole. And while there is also one “resident representative” on the Board of Commissioners who was appointed by former Mayor C. Ray Nagin, this individual is not someone I’ve seen at various neighborhood meetings I’ve attended. It is also worth noting that none of the 13 Board of Commissioners members attend the NOPD 8th District NONPAC meetings regularly.
Residents of the French Quarter have no role whatsoever in selecting the FQMHAMD’s appointed Board of Commissioners members, nor is there any requirement that these individuals be responsive or accountable to the community they serve as a whole. If you don’t pay membership dues to VCPORA, FQC, or FMIA, you are effectively disenfranchised (assuming that these organizations actually act in a manner that is representative of the actual viewpoints of their respective memberships, which has recently been questioned). The same is true if you’re not on the invitation list for the cocktail parties or dinners where you’re most likely to run into at least a few of the members of the FQMHAMD Board of Commissioners (unless you’ve been hired to mix the drinks or serve the meal).
The “Management and Operations Plan” approved by the FQMHAMD Board of Commissioners on 9/7/10 includes a one-page “3 Year Budget.” If approved, the security district parcel fee would be non-revocable (it would remain in effect until the district’s term expiration in 2014) and will cost a projected minimum of $2,996,982 in levied property taxes. As stated publicly by the Vice Chair of FQMHAMD on 7/12/2010: “It’s a three-year experiment funded with tax dollars.”
What will the tax-paying general public receive for this $3 million expense? Two FQMHAMD paid staff positions (an Executive Director and an Executive Assistant), 900 sq. ft. of office space and parking for these two employees for 28.8% of the projected annual budget or $863,345 over three years’ time, plus the FQMHAMD will “be able to afford an average of three officers patrol each shift” for three eight-hour shifts each day. It is disconcerting that FQMHAMD “Management and Operations Plan” creates, on an average day, a 1:1 ratio between desk-based positions (the Executive Director and Executive Assistant positions for FQMHAMD, plus the contracted security firm’s Operations Manager) and the three patrolling security officers who will be responsible for enhancing the safety of the French Quarter Security District.
While the FQMHAMD states one of its guiding principles is to “maximize return on investment for taxpayers, investing resources wisely and keeping overhead costs to a minimum,” the proposed budget provides little reassurance in this regard.
Likewise, while improved security is identified as a priority, it takes a back seat to ordinance enforcement, nuisance abatement, and the reporting/observation/documentation duties to be performed by patrolling security personnel. “The public safety program will provide direct benefits in the service area, ensuring the consistent, reliable enforcement of ordinances” and by helping to relieve “the burden placed upon the 8th District and the 1st District of the New Orleans Police Department by the high volume of public nuisance and quality of life violations,” such as “panhandling, public urination, graffiti, loitering, public disturbance, blocked driveways, non-violent disputes, and disruptively loud music.”
(What’s next? Going after Mr. Okra for his use of amplification as he drives through the neighborhood, calling out, “I have oranges and bananas…”?)
When patrolling security officers observe “Violence and/or Felony” situations, per the “Management and Operations Plan” approved by the FQMHAMD Board of Commissioners on 9/7/10, they are to respond as follows:
- “Under no circumstances will an Armed Patrol Officer or Patrol Supervisor un-holster his or her firearm.”
- “The Patrol Officer or Patrol Supervisor will brandish and use FQMHAMD-issued pepper spray with extreme caution and only if the offender has physically assaulted or attempted to assault the Patrol Officer or Patrol Supervisor.”
- Patrol Officers or Patrol Supervisors that observe violent offenses and/or a felony in progress will attempt to record as much data concerning the engagement, including the location, time, offense, and other salient information.”
- Patrolling security officers (regardless of position title or status of being “armed” or “unarmed”) will not have the legal authority to arrest anyone or to issue citations; these tasks will continue to be the responsibility of the NOPD 8th or 1st District police officers.
Will the French Quarter truly be any safer when the patrolling security officers are tasked with addressing instances of public urination and documenting graffiti, while being limited to acting defensively only in circumstances where an “offender has physically assaulted or attempted to assault the Patrol Officer or Patrol Supervisor?”
If the FQMHAMD Board of Commissioners doesn’t believe that the NOPD is getting the job done with an average of 35 officers on the street during each shift, how will the addition of an average of three glorified mall cops in spiffy uniforms magically tip the balance in favor of me walking home safely at night?
The FQMHAMD makes an unvarnished bid for support by selling the appeal of so-called “Escort”/Accompaniment Services, the only direct benefit for the tax-paying residents of the security district, but with limitations:
“Security officers will accompany, or ‘tail,’ individuals who feel unsafe walking from one location to another within the security district. Officers will not provide ‘rides’ in their vehicles to such individuals, but rather will provide security and comfort of a watchful eye as an individual walks.” Because the FQMHAMD has deemed foot patrols to “not be practical given the size of the service area,” this means that the security officer in a motorized vehicle or on a bicycle is limited to traveling at the speed of the walking person(s) being escorted, and the person being escorted must travel a route dictated by the direction of the flow of traffic.)
As the FQMHAMD realizes that the demand for such a service will likely be significant, it notes the following: “If providing the [escort] service to all who request it would sacrifice the overall benefit provided by the patrolling security officer, then the service will have to be rationed.”
The FQMHAMD Board of Commissioners is nothing more than an elite oligarchy; it is appalling to me that our Honorable Councilmembers Kristin Gisleson Palmer, Arnie Fielkow, and Jacquelyn Brechtel Clarkson have expressed support for the parcel fee measure on behalf of this group. Those who are not part of the moneyed class that are voting against this tax on October 2nd should remember this when the next opportunity to vote for city council representation rolls around.
This emphasis on so-called “quality of life” issues, such as enforcement of the noise ordinance as it applies to street musicians or public nuisance abatement, is the true agenda of these individuals who are seeking to improve property values over genuinely improving public safety.
While aggressive panhandling, public urination, and “disruptively loud music” (usually of the top-40 karaoke variety) are occasional-but-brief annoyances I experience while walking in my neighborhood, they aren’t the issues that make me careful to communicate my whereabouts to close friends when I’m out and about in the night.
It disgusts me that those who are pushing for these so-called improvements play on the fear of how Wendy Byrne’s life ended to make a bid for power to further this agenda, a woman who was likely faceless to them in life (except possibly as a rental tenant).
The French Quarter/Marigny Historic Area Management District “Management and Operations Plan” as approved by the FQMHAMD Board of Commissioners for your consideration: http://bit.ly/cVG0md
My Opposition Statement published 9/22/10: http://bit.ly/OppStmt-9-22-10
Coda (5-27-2010): Over the weekend, a “Make the Quarter Safe — Vote Yes” sign appeared on my block at a neighbor’s home.
One of the owners of this residence was the physician who rendered medical assistance to Wendy Byrne, who kept her breathing during the last minutes of her life (before the EMT vehicle arrived). Shortly after the fateful events of that night, the owners of this home spoke enthusiastically of enhancing the lighting on their property, and of adding security cameras to their corner location where they’d be of particular value.
Adding lighting to private property in the French Quarter is not a simple matter. The Vieux Carré Commission (VCC) controls alterations to structures in the French Quarter in the interest of historic preservation. During the summer of 2008, it was proposed that a small number of light fixture options might be pre-approved by the VCC as a means to allow property owners to enhance lighting at residential properties (thereby expediting the VCC’s permit approval process). While reasonable and appropriate light fixture options were identified, the VCC has, to date, not acted to support this effort; it’s ironic that the VCC’s Chair is one of the 13 FQMHAMD Board of Commissioners members.
Almost two years later, the lighting at this home remains unchanged; if cameras have been added, they are unobtrusive (their presence cannot be visually confirmed). It seems that putting up a sign and leaving the task of defining improved public safety to the Board of Commissioners for the FQMHAMD was determined to be the easier option.